Canadian Federation of Students-Manitoba retracts Winnipeg mayoral candidate report cards

CFS-MB - Winnipeg Election Report Card - October 2014

After having published a report card which graded current City of Winnipeg mayoral candidates, the Canadian Federation of Students-Manitoba Component (CFS-MB) has retracted the report from its website. According to an article in The Manitoban, the report card was removed following an October 2nd CFS-MB executive meeting, only one day after having been published. For whatever reason, nobody was willing to talk about why the report card was revoked:

Zach Fleisher, chair of CFS-MB, refused to provide comment on the report card or its removal after the board meeting.

Jesse Blackman, UWSA [University of Winnipeg Students' Association] representative for the CFS-MB executive, was present at the board meeting and said “the board has decided to not comment publicly on this matter.”

However, CFS-MB deputy chairperson Mitchell van Ineveld told the Manitoban that a motion was passed at the meeting to remove the report card from the CFS-MB’s website and social media accounts, effectively cancelling the project.

While secrecy is nothing new when it comes to the CFS and all of its provincial components, not willing to comment publicly on the decision to cancel the project after spending time and resources is outright bizarre. However, thanks to Google, you can access the report card’s main page and all but one mayoral candidate’s report card page that appeared on the CFS-MB website:

CFS-MB Mayoral Report Cards main page:

Robert Falcon-Ouellette (A-):

Judy Wasylycia-Leis (A-):

Brian Bowman (B+):

Paula Havixbeck (C+):

David Sanders (C+):

Michel Fillion (D): Unavailable

Gord Steeves (F):

The methodology used to arrive at the letter grades for each candidate was not provided. All we know is that “[e]ach of the mayoral candidates was interviewed and each platform was assessed by members of the CFS-MB executive, who then assigned grades to each candidate.” The main page did however specify that the report card “does not represent a formal endorsement of any kind.”

UPDATED: Carleton University Student Association threatens bloggers, with legal action

According to an article published yesterday in The Leveller, bloggers Mathieu Murphy-Perron and Jarrah Hodge as well as were served with a cease and desist order from the Carleton University Student Association (“CUSA on behalf of Alexander Golovko and the members of the CUSA administration”). has obtained a copy of the cease and desist order, dated September 11, 2014, signed by Katie Black of CazaSaikaley LLP

The letter refers to a blog post, published on September 7th on Murphy-Perron’s blog, entitled “Safer(r) Spaces & CUSA’s shortcomings” which refers to the “F*uck Safe Spaces” shirts that were worn by students who The Charlatan has identified as Carleton University “orientation week leaders”. Images1 of these shirts circulated across various social media platforms but many seem to have since been deleted. 

The blog post was later published by under a different title: Carleton ‘F*uck Safe Space’ scandal legacy of conservative student union takeover. The order further claims that Ms. Hodge published Murphy-Perron’s blog post on her website, Gender Focus, on September 9th. While at the time of publication, the blog post was still accessible on both Murphy-Perron’s blog and, I was unable to find any mention of the blog post on Ms. Hodge’s website.


According to a series of tweets from Mathieu Murphy-Perron (above), he seriously considered taking down the blog post but decided against it. He also tweeted that “[i]t’s an uneasy feeling to be bullied into retracting criticism. No fun at all.” He also said that he stands by what he wrote as his blog post was well-sourced and was “fair criticism of CUSA’s elected reps.”

UPDATED: September 26, 2014

The CUSA executive released a statement via its website. In it, the executive clarifies that “CUSA is not in a legal dispute with the of the aforementioned parties [ and Mathieu Murphy-Perron]” and that its legal counsel sent the parties a cease and desist order because “CUSA was and remains concerned that a significant portion of the editorial did not accurately represent the work and reputation of this student association.” Following the publication of the cease and desist order in question by studentunion.caThe Leveller updated its article by also reproducing it. The update further included quotes from Wednesday’s CUSA Council meeting. 

1. Image originally posted to Twitter by Leslie Robertson (@GalldinRoberts).

Canadian Federation of Students dealt second legal blow in less than a week

You can support by sharing our content on social media, liking our Facebook page, and by making a small financial contribution via our donation page.

Yesterday, Quebec Superior Court Justice Gérard Dugré published his decision [in French] in the case that pit Sa Ge, a member of the Post-Graduate Students’ Society of McGill University (PGSS), against the Canadian Federation of Students (CFS).

The judge had a complicated balance to reach as the PGSS continues to be involved in a drawn out legal battle with the Canadian Federation of Students stemming from its 2010 referendum on continued membership in which students voted overwhelmingly to cease membership. A brief overview of that case was released by the PGSS last October. Therefore, Justice Dugré had to decide what effect, if any, a decision in Sa Ge’s case might have on future proceedings between the PGSS and the CFS (this case is set to be heard sometime in 2015).

A press release quotes Justice Dugré’s ruling:

The plaintiff has demonstrated a clear legal and quasi-constitutional right that a referendum take place in accordance with CFS bylaw I. Any delay in holding this referendum clearly causes an irreparable prejudice to the right of the plaintiff to not be affiliated with CFS. This prejudice is not only serious and irreparable but manifestly irreversible.

He concludes: “quasi-constitutional rights of the plaintiff are at stake and the legal and extralegal costs at play come from student fees, which could certainly be used in a more constructive fashion…”

Mr. Sa Ge is also quoted as having said: “This judgment sets a precedent for all Canadian students who believe in freedom of association. We thank the court for recognizing the importance of the voice of students, and in upholding the rights of students to not be held hostage by the [Canadian Federation of Students].”

Consult Regroupement des associations étudiantes c. Fédération canadienne des étudiants et étudiantes released late last week

More analysis to come…

National Post publishes op-ed touting Voluntary Student Unionism

On August 26, the National Post published an op-ed opposing mandatory fees for students’ unions. This op-ed argued that students’ unions were “spending their levy fees to fund controversial activities and political causes unrelated to post-secondary education,” engaging in “unfair student election practices” and practicing “financial mismanagement.” The op-ed was published by staffers for the Frontier Centre for Public Policy, a right-wing think tank. The FCPP published a paper entitled “The Case for Voluntary Student Unionism” (PDF) in 2011.

Devon Peters, the President of the University of Regina Students’ Union, published a reply to this op-ed in the Leader-Post, defending students’ unions as incubators of student leadership, through their sponsorship of clubs, societies, student newspapers, womens’ centres, and other organizations.